Sexual signaling under predation: attractive moths take the greater risks

Nils Cordes, Leif Engqvist, Tim Schmoll and Klaus Reinhold

Behavioral Ecology, 2014, vol. 25, issue 2, 409-414

Abstract: Individuals often have to balance the costs of risky behavior against the potential benefits they may gain from it. This trade-off is especially obvious in the interplay between natural and sexual selection because traits for mate attraction may attract predators as well. In the lesser wax moth Achroia grisella, ultrasonic sexual signaling comes with such a risk because calling for mates also attracts predatory bats. Attractive males should behave more cautiously than unattractive males under such circumstances, as they can expect more future mating opportunities and therefore have more to lose (the so-called asset protection principle). Contrary to these predictions, we found that pulse pair rate and peak amplitude, 2 song components attractive to females, correlated negatively with the duration of a silence response which is displayed when courtship song is experimentally overlayed with the search signal of a predator, the greater horseshoe bat. More attractive males thus recommence singing sooner than less attractive males. Although this is not in line with the asset protection principle, we discuss 3 different ways in which these distinct behavioral differences might be explained: 1) attractive males are in better condition and thus can more easily evade predators, 2) attractive signals are costly in terms of reduced life expectancy, and 3) risk-taking may in itself be a sexually selected trait and as such act as an honest signal of male quality.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art128 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:409-414.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().