Differences in conspicuousness between alternative color morphs in a polychromatic lizard

Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza and Enrique Font

Behavioral Ecology, 2015, vol. 26, issue 5, 1432-1446

Abstract: In polychromatic species, differences in conspicuousness among alternative color morphs may affect the costs and benefits relating to signal detectability by primary receivers and unintended observers. Using visual modeling, we studied the conspicuousness of the body coloration in a ventrally polychromatic population of common wall lizards (Podarcis muralis). This species shows a complex color pattern that combines brown dorsal coloration, long-wavelength–biased ventral coloration, and ventrolateral ultraviolet (UV)-blue patches that are used to signal male quality. Considering simultaneously the visual system of P. muralis and lizard predators, we quantified the chromatic and achromatic (intensity) contrasts of each body region viewed against natural backgrounds. We also quantified the internal contrast generated by pairs of adjacent color patches on the lizards’ body surface. We found that, in some cases, color patches used for signaling are better tuned to conspecifics than to predators, and are more conspicuous in males than in females. The UV-blue patches viewed against the long-wavelength–biased ventral coloration provide the most conspicuous color combination, suggesting that ventral colors may act as an amplifier and highlighting the relevance of color pattern complexity. In contrast, the dorsal coloration is the most cryptic coloration. The color morphs differ in conspicuousness, probably resulting in differences in signal efficacy as well as in costs caused by predator detection. The orange morph is the most chromatically conspicuous to conspecifics and predators, whereas the white morph shows the least chromatic conspicuousness, suggesting that the trade-off between detection by primary receivers and predators may be morph-dependent.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv075 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:1432-1446.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().