Turbidity weakens selection for assortment in body size in groups
Helen S. Kimbell and
Lesley J. Morrell
Behavioral Ecology, 2016, vol. 27, issue 2, 545-552
Abstract:
Prey animals commonly associate with similar-looking individuals to reduce predation risk, via a reduction in predator targeting accuracy (the confusion effect) and preferential targeting of distinct individuals (the oddity effect). These effects are mediated by body size, as predators often preferentially select large-bodied individuals, which are therefore at an increased risk within a group. The selection pressure to avoid oddity by associating with similar sized group mates is stronger for large individuals than small. This selection depends on the ability of both predators and prey to accurately assess body size and respond accordingly. In aquatic systems, turbidity degrades the visual environment and negatively impacts on the ability of predators to detect (and consume) prey. We assessed the effect of algal turbidity on predator–prey interactions in the context of the oddity effect from the perspective of both predator and prey. From a predator’s perspective, we find that 9-spined sticklebacks preferentially target larger Daphnia in mixed swarms in clear water, but not in turbid water, although the difference in attack rates is not statistically significant. When making shoaling decisions, large sticklebacks preferentially associate with size-matched individuals in clear water, but not turbid water, whereas small individuals showed no social preference in either clear or turbid water. We suggest that a reduced ability or motivation to discriminate between prey in turbid water relaxes the predation pressure on larger prey individuals allowing greater flexibility in shoaling decisions. Thus, turbidity may play a significant role in predator–prey interactions, by altering predator–prey interactions.
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv183 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:545-552.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett
More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().