Harsh vocal elements affect counter-singing dynamics in male rock hyrax

Vlad Demartsev, Einat Bar Ziv, Uria Shani, Yael Goll, Lee Koren and Eli Geffen

Behavioral Ecology, 2016, vol. 27, issue 5, 1397-1404

Abstract: Morton’s motivation-structural (MS) rules suggest that the acoustic structure of a signal can reflect the caller’s motivation and internal state. In many species, low-frequency and noisy (harsh) sounds have been found to comply with MS rules, accompanying agonistic interactions and functioning as a badge of aggression and dominance. Male rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) often produce long and complex advertisement calls (songs) both "spontaneously" and in counter-singing sessions with other males. Hyrax songs include a "snort" vocal element, which is a harsh sound produced only by mature, dominant males. We predicted that the number of snort elements in the song would affect the dynamics of male hyrax counter-singing. We performed 3 series of playback experiments of natural and artificially manipulated songs on a wild hyrax population. We found that the probability of initiating counter-singing by nearby males increased together with the number of snorts in the stimulus song. Furthermore, the receivers replied to the synthetic "snort-only" vocal sequences at an equal rate as to their origin song as long as the snort elements maintained their original position within the signal. Our findings suggest that the snort component is one of the main information transfer channels in male hyrax singing and can elicit conspecific singing even when isolated from other vocal elements. In addition, the position of snort elements (their temporal pattern and rhythm) bears a possible significance in keeping the overall signal meaningful. Finally, our findings support previous claims that harsh sounds constitute one of the key components in vocal communication.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw063 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1397-1404.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().