Avoiding the misuse of BLUP in behavioural ecology

Thomas M. Houslay and Alastair J. Wilson

Behavioral Ecology, 2017, vol. 28, issue 4, 948-952

Abstract: Lay SummaryResearch of causes and consequences of animal personality promises exciting insights, yet widely used tests can lead to spurious results: when predictions of individual-level random effects are used in secondary analyses, their error is not carried forward, leading to increased likelihood of ‘false positive’ errors. We demonstrate how alternative approaches enable behavioural ecologists to test hypotheses about the causes and consequences of individual behavioural variation while accounting for the uncertainty inherent in the random effects.

Keywords: animal personality; behavioural plasticity; behavioural syndromes; cognition; physiology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx023 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:948-952.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().