Tradeoffs associated with autotomy and regeneration and their potential role in the evolution of regenerative abilities

Tara Prestholdt, Tai White-Toney, Katie Bates, Kara Termulo, Sawyer Reid, Katy Kennedy, Zach Turley, Clayton Steed, Ryan Kain, Matt Ortman, Tim Luethke, Spencer Degerstedt and Masis Isikbay

Behavioral Ecology, 2022, vol. 33, issue 3, 518-525

Abstract: The capacity of certain animals to regrow a lost appendage has been exploited as a powerful tool to study development. As a result, we now understand many of the proximate details of the regeneration process. Ironically, despite being one of the oldest studied developmental phenomena, regeneration is not often considered in the context of natural selection and evolution. Why do select species retain the capacity to shed and regrow body parts, whereas more derived lineages do not? We conducted a comprehensive study on the costs and benefits of autotomy and regeneration on Hemigrapsus nudus, the purple shore crab. In the realms of feeding and locomotion, regeneration restored fitness to what it otherwise would have been; autotomized animals showed decreases in feeding and locomotion, but regenerated animals performed no differently than intact crabs. However, for fecundity and male–male competition, regenerated animals had the lowest fitness compared with control and autotomized crabs. Our results raise the intriguing possibility that tradeoffs associated with reproduction may have led to the loss of regenerative abilities in derived lineages such as mammals and birds. Future work on the hundreds of species that regenerate lost body parts will reveal if and how this hypothesis can address the pervasive speculation plaguing the ultimate causes of regenerative losses.

Keywords: autotomy; evolution; fitness; Hemigrapsus nudus; regeneration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac004 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:518-525.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().