Patterns and drivers of female extra-pair mating in wild Kalahari meerkats

Annika Herdtle, Chris Duncan, Marta B Manser and Tim Clutton-Brock

Behavioral Ecology, 2025, vol. 36, issue 3, 1147-1167

Abstract: In many pair-living vertebrates, females commonly mate outside the pair bond, but when and why they do so is unclear. This behavior may stem from females seeking “good genes” or “compatible genes” from extra-pair mates superior to or less related than their partner. Variation in female ability to acquire extra-pair copulations, however, may also influence extra-pair paternity rates. We analyze 23 yr of parentage data to explore extra-pair paternity in wild Kalahari meerkats (Suricata suricatta), cooperative breeders where a single dominant pair monopolizes most reproduction in each group. When paired with a familiar breeding partner, females almost exclusively mate extra-pair to avoid inbreeding; however, even when paired with an unfamiliar male, extra-pair paternity still occurs. In our study of unfamiliar pairings, 14% of dominant female litters contained extra-pair paternity, with 90% of offspring sired by resident dominant males, 7% by extra-group males, and 3% by subordinate immigrant males. Results were not consistent with the compatible or good genes hypotheses: more closely related dominant pairs were not more prone to extra-group paternity; extra-group sires were not less related, heavier, or older than the resident dominant male; and offspring from extra-group matings did not demonstrate advantages over within-pair offspring. Extra-group paternity was more likely when dominant females were heavier, dominant males were lighter, more extra-group males visited, and few subordinate males resided in the group, suggesting extra-pair paternity rates are primarily driven by individual and social conditions. Whether females benefit from extra-pair paternity or simply mate with any available male remains unclear.

Keywords: cooperative breeding; extra-pair paternity; female choice; good genes; inbreeding avoidance; indirect benefits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araf016 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1147-1167.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().