Nonparametric Bayes modelling of count processes

Antonio Canale and David B. Dunson

Biometrika, 2013, vol. 100, issue 4, 801-816

Abstract: Data on count processes arise in a variety of applications, including longitudinal, spatial and imaging studies measuring count responses. The literature on statistical models for dependent count data is dominated by models built from hierarchical Poisson components. The Poisson assumption is not warranted in many applied contexts, and hierarchical Poisson models make restrictive assumptions about overdispersion in marginal distributions. In this article we propose a class of nonparametric Bayes count process models, constructed through rounding real-valued underlying processes. The proposed class of models accommodates situations in which separate count-valued functional data are observed for each subject under study. Theoretical results on large support and posterior consistency are established, and computational algorithms are developed based on Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. The methods are evaluated via simulation and illustrated by application to longitudinal tumour counts and to asthma inhaler usage. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/ast037 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:4:p:801-816

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().