EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The asymptotic inadmissibility of the spatial sign covariance matrix for elliptically symmetric distributions

Andrew F. Magyar and David E. Tyler

Biometrika, 2014, vol. 101, issue 3, 673-688

Abstract: The asymptotic efficiency of the spatial sign covariance matrix relative to affine equivariant estimators of scatter is studied. In particular, the spatial sign covariance matrix is shown to be asymptotically inadmissible, i.e., the asymptotic covariance matrix of the consistency-corrected spatial sign covariance matrix is uniformly larger than that of its affine equivariant counterpart, namely Tyler’s scatter matrix. Although the spatial sign covariance matrix has often been recommended when one is interested in principal components analysis, its inefficiency is shown to be most severe in situations where principal components are of greatest interest. Simulation shows that the inefficiency of the spatial sign covariance matrix also holds for small sample sizes, and that the asymptotic relative efficiency is a good approximation to the finite-sample efficiency for relatively modest sample sizes.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asu020 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:101:y:2014:i:3:p:673-688.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:101:y:2014:i:3:p:673-688.