EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Goodness of fit of biplots and correspondence analysis

K. Ruben Gabriel

Biometrika, 2002, vol. 89, issue 2, 423-436

Abstract: The present paper examines proportional goodness of fit to variables recorded on individuals, the variances and covariances of the variables, and the form and distances between individuals. No single plot displays all three optimally in the sense of least squares. However, even aspects which are non-optimally fitted by biplots and Benzecri plots often closely preserve the optimal fit. This is shown by means of a preservation-of-fit function which depends on the type of display and on the ratio of the second to the first singular value of the data matrix. This function is never below 0·5, so at least half the fit is always preserved, and it is close to 1 unless the ratio of the singular values is small. That explains the frequently observed similarity of the various biplots and the Benzecri plot and the fact that they usually lead to the same conclusions. It follows that in many applications it is reasonable to use either the symmetric biplot or the Benzecri plot or a compromise maximin preservation plot, and that the difference between these three is usually unimportant. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2002, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:2:p:423-436

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:2:p:423-436