Equivalence of prospective and retrospective models in the Bayesian analysis of case-control studies

Shaun R. Seaman

Biometrika, 2004, vol. 91, issue 1, 15-25

Abstract: The natural likelihood to use for a case-control study is a 'retrospective' likelihood, i.e. a likelihood based on the probability of exposure given disease status. Prentice & Pyke (1979) showed that, when a logistic regression form is assumed for the probability of disease given exposure, the maximum likelihood estimators and asymptotic covariance matrix of the log odds ratios obtained from the retrospective likelihood are the same as those obtained from the 'prospective' likelihood, i.e. that based on probability of disease given exposure. We prove a similar result for the posterior distribution of the log odds ratios in a Bayesian analysis. This means that the Bayesian analysis of case-control studies may be done using a relatively simple model, the logistic regression model, which treats data as though generated prospectively and which does not involve nuisance parameters for the exposure distribution. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:91:y:2004:i:1:p:15-25

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().