A comparison of sequential and non-sequential designs for discrimination between nested regression models

Holger Dette

Biometrika, 2004, vol. 91, issue 1, 165-176

Abstract: Classical regression analysis is usually performed in two steps. In a first step an appropriate model is identified to describe the data-generating process and in a second step statistical inference is performed in the identified model. In this paper we investigate a sequential and a non-sequential design strategy, which take into account these different goals of the analysis for a class of nested models. It is demonstrated that non-sequential designs usually identify the 'correct' model with a higher probability than sequential methods. Although non-sequential designs can never be guaranteed to achieve the best possible efficiency in the 'correct' model, it is demonstrated by means of a simulation study that for realistic sample sizes the efficiencies of the non-sequential designs for the estimation of the parameters in the 'correct' model are at least as high as the corresponding efficiencies of the sequential methods. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:91:y:2004:i:1:p:165-176

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().