Assessing robustness of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions

Annie Qu

Biometrika, 2004, vol. 91, issue 2, 447-459

Abstract: In the presence of data contamination or outliers, some empirical studies have indicated that the two methods of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions appear to have rather different robustness behaviour. This paper presents a theoretical investigation from the perspective of the influence function to identify the causes for the difference. We show that quadratic inference functions lead to bounded influence functions and the corresponding M-estimator has a redescending property, but the generalised estimating equation approach does not. We also illustrate that, unlike generalised estimating equations, quadratic inference functions can still provide consistent estimators even if part of the data is contaminated. We conclude that the quadratic inference function is a preferable method to the generalised estimating equation as far as robustness is concerned. This conclusion is supported by simulations and real-data examples. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:91:y:2004:i:2:p:447-459

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead

More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().