Compound optimal allocation for individual and collective ethics in binary clinical trials
Alessandro Baldi Antognini and
Alessandra Giovagnoli
Biometrika, 2010, vol. 97, issue 4, 935-946
Abstract:
In recent years, several authors have investigated response-adaptive allocation rules for comparative clinical trials, in order to favour, at each stage of the trial, the treatment that appears to be best. In this paper, we define admissible allocations, namely treatment assignments that cannot be simultaneously improved upon with respect to both a specific design criterion, reflecting the inferential properties of the experiment, and the proportion of patients assigned to the best treatment or treatments; we survey existing designs from this viewpoint. We also suggest combining information and ethical considerations by taking a suitable weighted mean of two corresponding standardized criteria, with weights that depend on the actual treatment effects. This compound criterion leads to a locally optimal allocation that can be targeted by some response-adaptive randomization rule. The paper mainly deals with the case of two treatments, but the suggested methodology is shown to extend to more than two. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asq055 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:biomet:v:97:y:2010:i:4:p:935-946
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Biometrika is currently edited by Paul Fearnhead
More articles in Biometrika from Biometrika Trust Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().