A Technical Definition of Uncertainty and the Long-run Non-neutrality of Money
Paul Davidson
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1988, vol. 12, issue 3, 329-37
Abstract:
A technical definition of uncertainty can be developed if economic observations can be generated by stochastic processes. Uncertainty about the future is then defined in terms of the existence of a nonergodic economic environment. In such an environment, statistics based on either cross-sectional data or on past time-series data do not provide good forecasts of future outcomes, i.e., past evidence does not provide reliable estimates of future results. The problem facing every decisionmaker is to determine whether the phenomena is sufficiently time invariant as to be presumed ergodic or whether nonergodic circumstances are involved. Keynes's use of uncertainty in the discussion of liquidity is compatible with a nonergodic environment. Only in a nonergodic environment do the concepts of money, fixed contracts, and liquidity make sense, and then all existence theorems for general equilibrium are jeopardized. Copyright 1988 by Oxford University Press.
Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Chapter: A Technical Definition of Uncertainty and the Long-run Non-neutrality of Money (1991)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:12:y:1988:i:3:p:329-37
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue
More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().