Morishima on Ricardo: Two Replies

M Morishima

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996, vol. 20, issue 1, 91-109

Abstract: Although David Ricardo does not use the concept 'general equilibrium,' his model may be described in terms of several sectors forming a consistent system. The author can find many similarities in formulations and conclusions between his and Leon Walras's economics, despite the fact that historians of economic thought generally tend to reject such a portrait of Ricardo. This paper is mainly a response to H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori's (1992) criticisms of M. Morishima's Ricardo, from Piero Sraffa's point of view. None of the criticisms is accepted. The author also defends himself from T. Peach whom he takes to be representative of the historians' view of Ricardo. (c) 1996 Academic Press Limited Copyright 1996 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:20:y:1996:i:1:p:91-109

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().