Against Posner against Coase against Theory

Uskali Maki

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 22, issue 5, 587-95

Abstract: In two articles published in 1993, Richard Posner characterized and vigorously attached Ronald Coase's methodological orientation. Coase resisted Posner's diagnosis, but did not provide a response. This paper offers a response which Coase might have given. One of Posner's major claims was that Coase is 'antitheoretical' or 'hostile to theory.' Here it is suggested that Posner's allegations suffer from serious unreflected ambiguities. Once we distinguish between a few different meanings of 'theory' (and 'theoreticity'), and between attitudes and accomplishments in regard to theory (or between being antitheoretical, nontheoretical, protheoretical, and theoretical), it becomes possible to argue that Coase does not hold an antitheoretical attitude even if his accomplishments fall short of theory in many (but not all) senses of the word. The larger relevance of this conflict is that its confusions tend to be characteristic of parts of the economics profession more widely. Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:22:y:1998:i:5:p:587-95

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().