Harrod's Dynamics and the Theory of Growth: The Story of a Mistaken Attribution

Daniele Besomi

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2001, vol. 25, issue 1, 79-96

Abstract: Post-Keynesian growth theory is normally seen as originating from Harrod's 1939 "Essay in Dynamic Theory". Harrod, however, was trying to lay the foundations of a new approach to economic dynamics, and often complained of misinterpretation. In this paper, the grounds of Harrod's argument are examined and compared with the "textbook" interpretation. The latter is shown to be extremely reductive, as it ignores both Harrod's interest in the trade cycle and his methodological criticism of the "time-lag theories of the cycle", and it also underrates the interesting implications of his non-linear approach and the epistemic implications of the instability principle. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:79-96

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().