Adam Smith and the division of labour: is there a difference between organisation and market?
StÈphan Vincent-Lancrin
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 27, issue 2, 209-224
Abstract:
The paper claims that, in The Wealth of Nations, the division of labour refers simultaneously to two different things: a social division of labour and an organisational division of labour. The central point is that the organisation of work (the organisational division of labour) in the firm is the logical counterpart of the social division of labour, and that these reflect two inseparable aspects of the process of the division of labour. Smith is thus concerned with organisations as well as with markets, each functioning according to the same principle. Hence, Smith does not believe that the organisational and the social divisions of labour are fundamentally different, although he does recognise some variation between them and describes different states of the division of labour within the firm, liberal and capitalist. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:27:y:2003:i:2:p:209-224
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue
More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().