A note of dissent on the 'index number' interpretation of Adam Smith's 'real measure'

Terry Peach

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2008, vol. 32, issue 5, 821-826

Abstract: This paper offers a critical comment on the interpretation that Adam Smith's 'real measure of exchangeable value' was addressed, at least in part, to the index number problem of estimating intertemporal changes in general purchasing power. It is argued that the 'real measure' is incapable of performing such a role, that Smith was aware of its limitations in this respect, and that commentators have been misled by his (legitimate) use of the measure in more restrictive contexts. Copyright The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ben010 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:32:y:2008:i:5:p:821-826

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().