EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: a critical survey

Eckhard Hein, Marc Lavoie and Till van Treeck

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2011, vol. 35, issue 3, 587-612

Abstract: We tackle the issue of the possible instability of the Kaleckian distribution and growth model. Distinguishing between Keynesian and Harrodian instability, we review various mechanisms that have been proposed by critics of the Kaleckian model to tame Harrodian instability while bringing back the rate of utilisation to its normal rate. We find that the mechanisms that have been suggested are far from convincing. Therefore, we conclude that it may be premature for the critics of the Kaleckian model to dismiss the endogeneity of the rate of capacity utilisation in long-run growth equilibrium. Copyright The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (51) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beq026 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: A critical survey (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:35:y:2011:i:3:p:587-612

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2019-11-09
Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:35:y:2011:i:3:p:587-612