Economics at your fingertips  

An alternative explanation of India's growth transition: a demand-side hypothesis

Kevin Nell ()

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2013, vol. 37, issue 1, 113-141

Abstract: This paper formalises the balance-of-payments-constrained (BPC) growth model in a two-regime framework to re-examine India's growth transition in 1980 from a demand-side perspective, as an alternative to the 'supply-oriented' approaches of previous studies. The results provide strong evidence of a demand-led growth transition. Although the government-led expenditure strategy of the 1980s fulfilled the role of moving the Indian economy out of its slow-growing demand regime (1952–79) into a faster-growing one, it could not sustain demand growth at the natural rate due to a balance-of-payments constraint. Consistent with the prediction of the BPC growth model, faster export growth in the post-1990 liberalisation period sustained demand growth at its maximum rate by allowing expenditure (including government spending) to grow at a fast rate. The analysis further suggests that India's export surge in the post-1990 liberalisation period has a significant demand-side explanation, rather than an exclusively supply-side interpretation. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().

Page updated 2021-03-28
Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:113-141