EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to evaluate creative destruction: reconstructing Schumpeter's approach

Christian Schubert ()

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2013, vol. 37, issue 2, 227-250

Abstract: Economic change, while promoting innovation and growth, at the same time generates 'gales of creative destruction'. It is still largely unclear what this concept implies for the task of assessing welfare (and, correspondingly, the need for and the scope of policy making) in a novelty-generating, knowledge-based economy. Is novelty desirable per se? Is a rise of living standards due to innovation always worth the risks involved? Standard welfare economics is inherently incapable of answering these questions. By examining Joseph Schumpeter's explicit and implicit reasoning on welfare and linking his thoughts to recent ideas, within normative economics, on how to redefine 'well-being' when preferences are variable and inconsistent, we argue that in an evolving economy, well-being should not be conceptualised in static preference-satisfaction terms, but rather in partly procedural terms of 'effective preference learning'. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes055 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:2:p:227-250

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2021-09-26
Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:2:p:227-250