Work arrangements and firm innovation: is there any relationship?
Caterina Giannetti and
Marianna Madia
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2013, vol. 37, issue 2, 273-297
Abstract:
This study investigates the relationship between labour market flexibility—proxied by the proportion of workers with different contractual arrangements and other indicators of flexible work relations—and firms' innovative ability, as measured by the percentage of new products in total sales. On the one hand, 'more flexibility' (e.g. a higher labour turnover) might be favourable to a firm's innovation potential. Aside from having (potential) wage savings, a larger inflow of new personnel may enrich the pool of firm innovative ideas. On the other hand, higher work flexibility may also have some drawbacks: a permanently high turnover rate may diminish social cohesion and trust and increase the probability of opportunistic behaviour. Results suggest that internal flexibility is positively associated with innovation for both high-tech and low-tech firms. Especially for high-tech firms, however, greater external flexibility might hinder innovation. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes067 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:2:p:273-297
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue
More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().