 The robot, the party animal and the philosopher: an evolutionary perspective on deliberation and preferenceCambridge Journal of Economics, 2013, vol. 37, issue 6, 1263-1282 Abstract: This paper examines the evolutionary fitness of a variety of ways of reaching decisions in early hunter-gatherer societies, in order to derive insights about how economists should view modern consumers. It challenges conclusions reached by mainstream economists Robson, Rayo and Becker about why hunter-gatherers needed sensory rewards and about the kinds of preference systems that would have conferred evolutionary fitness. It argues that evolution favours those with a variety of ways of reaching decisions—programmed, deliberative, intuitive and 'go with the flow'—and that the prospect of sensory rewards serves an evolutionary role by diverting people from thinking too much about what they are doing in situations in which deliberation might interfere with survival or reproduction. The evolutionary role of a reluctance or failure to make trade-offs is also considered along with the benefits of developing a relatively fixed identity rather than being 'all things to all men'. Copyright , Oxford University Press. Date: 2013 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:6:p:1263-1282 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.