Robertson and the Cambridge approach to utility and welfare

Mauro Boianovsky

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2014, vol. 38, issue 4, 961-985

Abstract: The article investigates Dennis Robertson’s effort to defend the Cambridge utilitarian tradition against the ‘new welfare economics’, developed in the 1930s and 1940s on the basis of Lionel Robbins’s influential criticism of the scientific legitimacy of interpersonal comparisons of utility. It is shown that Robertson’s sustained endeavour to rescue Marshallian cardinal utility attracted some attention from economists at the time. Robertson claimed that welfare economics should be based on cardinal utility and that the ordinalist revolution in the consumer and welfare theories should be rejected. His claims were based on a careful discussion of what he saw as theoretical inconsistencies of the ordinalist approach.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bet074 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:38:y:2014:i:4:p:961-985.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().