Competitiveness and industrial policy: from rationalities of failure towards the ability to evolve

Michael Peneder

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2017, vol. 41, issue 3, 829-858

Abstract: This article elaborates a dynamic rationale of industrial policy, focusing on how to strengthen the socio-economic system’s ability to evolve, i.e. how to achieve high real income together with qualitative change. It highlights that the ubiquitous rationalities of failure, be it of markets, governments or systems, are rooted in a peculiar habit of accepting hypothetical perfect states as normative benchmarks. In contrast, a dynamic logic of intervention should start from the question, what the system aims to accomplish. Combining the structuralist ontology of micro-, meso- and macro with the functional principles of evolutionary change, the paper proposes a general typology of economic policies based on their respective contributions to the system’s ability to evolve.

Keywords: Industrial policy; Competitiveness; Evolutionary economics; Structural change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L52 L53 O25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (44)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bew025 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:41:y:2017:i:3:p:829-858.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().