Sensationalism, Newspaper Profits and the Marginal Value of Watergate
Fred S McChesney
Economic Inquiry, 1987, vol. 25, issue 1, 135-44
Newspaper publishers supposedly profit from sensational events. Focusing on the two different products sold by publishers, newspapers and ad vertising space, this paper shows why sensational events do not necessarily increase publishers' wealth. It also uses financial market analysis to examine the wealth effects of one sensational event, Watergate, on a portfolio of newspaper stocks and on the Washington Post in particular. No significant effects are found. Copyright 1987 by Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:25:y:1987:i:1:p:135-44
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Preston McAfee
More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().