Common Law, Statute Law, and the Theory of Legislative Choice: An Inquiry into the Goal of the Sherman Act

Andrew N Kleit

Economic Inquiry, 1993, vol. 31, issue 4, 647-62

Abstract: Although the Sherman Antitrust Act is more than a century old, debate continues over its goals. In contrast to what many have argued, the author contends that the act's main goal is to maximize economic efficiency, rather than the welfare of consumers. The Sherman Act is a modest extension of the common law, which the 'law and economics' literature indicates moves towards economic efficiency. Further, unlike the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, Sherman Act decisions are made by courts, not a regulatory agency. Thus, the theory of legislature choice also implies that the goal of the act is to maximize economic efficiency. Copyright 1993 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:31:y:1993:i:4:p:647-62

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().