Designing a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense?

Davide Debortoli, Jinill Kim, Jesper Lindé and Ricardo Nunes

The Economic Journal, 2019, vol. 129, issue 621, 2010-2038

Abstract: Yes, a dual mandate makes a lot of sense. This article studies how to design simple loss functions for central banks, as parsimonious approximations to social welfare. We show, both analytically and quantitatively, that simple loss functions should feature a high weight on measures of economic activity, sometimes even larger than the weight on inflation. Two main factors drive our result. First, stabilising economic activity also stabilises other welfare-relevant variables. Second, the estimated model features mitigated inflation distortions due to a low elasticity of substitution between monopolistic goods and a low interest rate sensitivity of demand. The result holds up in the presence of measurement errors, with large shocks that generate a trade-off between stabilising inflation and resource utilisation, and also when imposing a moderate degree of interest rate volatility.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecoj.12630 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Designing a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense? (2019)
Working Paper: Designing a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense? (2017)
Working Paper: Designing a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense? (2017)
Working Paper: Designing a simple loss function for central banks: Does a dual mandate make sense? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:129:y:2019:i:621:p:2010-2038.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi

More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().