EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

It Sucks to Be Single! Marital Status and Redistribution of Social Security

Female labor supply as insurance against idiosyncratic risk

Max Groneck and Johanna Wallenius

The Economic Journal, 2021, vol. 131, issue 633, 327-371

Abstract: In this article, we study the labour supply effects and the redistributional consequences of the US social security system. We focus particularly on auxiliary benefits, where eligibility is linked to marital status. To this end, we develop a dynamic, structural life cycle model of singles and couples, featuring uncertain marital status and survival. We account for the socio-economic gradients to both marriage stability and life expectancy. We find that auxiliary benefits have a large depressing effect on married women’s employment. Moreover, we show that a revenue neutral minimum benefit scheme would moderately reduce inequality relative to the current US system.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaa078 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: It Sucks to Be Single! Marital Status and Redistribution of Social Security (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: It Sucks to Be Single! Marital Status and Redistribution of Social Security (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:633:p:327-371.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi

More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:633:p:327-371.