Revisiting the Hypothesis of High Discounts and High Unemployment
Paolo Martellini,
Guido Menzio and
Ludo Visschers
The Economic Journal, 2021, vol. 131, issue 637, 2203-2232
Abstract:
We revisit the hypothesis that cyclical fluctuations in unemployment are caused by shocks to the discount rate. We use a simple but rich search-theoretic model of the labour market in which the UE, EU and EE rates are all endogenous. Analytically, we show that an increase in the discount rate lowers the UE rate and, under some natural conditions, it lowers the EU rate. Quantitatively, we show that an increase in the discount rate from 4% to 10% generates a 3.5% decline in the UE rate and a 6% decline in the EU rate. These findings are at odds with the actual behaviour of the US labour market over the business cycle, which features a negative comovement between the UE and EU rates.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaa138 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Revisiting the Hypothesis of High Discounts and High Unemployment (2020) 
Working Paper: Revisiting the Hypothesis of High Discounts and High Unemployment (2020) 
Working Paper: Revisiting the Hypothesis of High Discounts and High Unemployment (2019) 
Working Paper: Revisiting the Hypothesis of High Discounts and High Unemployment (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:637:p:2203-2232.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi
More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().