Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from The U.S. Congress

Stefano Gagliarducci and M. Daniele Paserman

The Economic Journal, 2022, vol. 132, issue 641, 218-257

Abstract: This paper uses data on bill co-sponsorship in the U.S. House of Representatives to estimate gender differences in cooperative behaviour. We find that among Democrats there is no significant gender gap in the number of co-sponsors recruited, but women-sponsored bills tend to have fewer co-sponsors from the opposite party. On the other hand, we find robust evidence that Republican women recruit more co-sponsors and attract more bipartisan support on the bills that they sponsor. We interpret these results as evidence that cooperation is mostly driven by a commonality of interest, rather than gender per se.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueab069 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from the U.S. Congress (2016)
Working Paper: Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from the U.S. Congress (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:641:p:218-257.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi

More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().