Preferences, Confusion and Competition

Andreas Hefti, Shuo Liu and Armin Schmutzler

The Economic Journal, 2022, vol. 132, issue 645, 1852-1881

Abstract: Existing literature has argued that firms benefit from confusing consumers of homogeneous goods. This paper shows that this insight generally breaks down with differentiated goods and heterogeneous preferences: with polarised taste distributions, firms fully educate consumers. In cases where firms nevertheless confuse consumers, the welfare consequences are worse than for homogeneous goods, as consumers choose dominated options. Similar insights are also obtained for political contests, in which candidates compete for voters with heterogeneous preferences: parties choose ambiguous platforms only when preferences are ‘indecisive’, featuring a concentration of indifferent voters.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueac009 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Preferences, Confusion and Competition (2020)
Working Paper: Preferences, confusion and competition (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:645:p:1852-1881.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi

More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().