Job protection legislation and productivity growth in OECD countries
Appropriate growth policy: a unifying framework
Andrea Bassanini,
Luca Nunziata and
Danielle Venn
Economic Policy, 2009, vol. 24, issue 58, 349-402
Abstract:
We examine the effect of dismissal regulation on productivity in the OECD, using annual cross-country aggregate data on the stringency of employment protection legislation and industry-level data on productivity from 1982 to 2003. Our empirical results suggest that mandatory dismissal regulations have a depressing impact on productivity growth in industries where layoff restrictions are more likely to be binding. By contrast, we find no evidence of a productivity effect of regulations concerning temporary contracts, which suggests that partial reforms, facilitating the use of fixed-term and atypical contracts, are unlikely to have an important impact on efficiency and technological change and cannot therefore be a substitute for comprehensive reforms whereby dismissal restrictions for open-ended contracts are also weakened.— Andrea Bassanini, Luca Nunziata and Danielle Venn
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (239)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2009.00221.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Job Protection Legislation and Productivity Growth in OECD Countries (2008) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:24:y:2009:i:58:p:349-402.
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Policy is currently edited by Ghazala Azmat, Roberto Galbiati, Isabelle Mejean and Moritz Schularick
More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po Contact information at EDIRC., CES Contact information at EDIRC., MSH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().