EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Monnet’s error?

Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza () and Luigi Zingales ()

Economic Policy, 2016, vol. 31, issue 86, 247-297

Abstract: In entering a currency union without any political union European countries have taken a gamble: will the needs of the currency unions force a political integration (as anticipated by Monnet) or will the tensions create a backlash, as suggested by Kaldor, Friedman and many others? We try to answer this question by analyzing the cross sectional and time series variation in pro-European sentiments in the EU 15 countries. The 1992 Maastricht Treaty seems to have reduced the pro-Europe sentiment as does the 2010 Eurozone crisis. Yet, in spite of the worst recession in recent history, the Europeans still support the common currency. Europe seems trapped: there is no desire to go backward, no interest in going forward, but it is economically unsustainable to stay still.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/epolic/eiw003 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Monnet's Error? (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Monnet's Error (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Monnet's Error? (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Monnet’s Error? (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:31:y:2016:i:86:p:247-297.

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Policy is currently edited by Giuseppe Bertola, Philippe Martin and Paul Seabright

More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR Contact information at EDIRC., CES Contact information at EDIRC., MSH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2021-01-25
Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:31:y:2016:i:86:p:247-297.