Measuring the Welfare Costs of Supply Management: The Role of Indirect Benefits
Gerrit van Kooten
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1990, vol. 17, issue 1, 57-67
This study indicates that it is important to take into account what happens in other markets when evaluating the social costs of government agricultural programs. However, indirect benefits (costs) accruing in other markets are only to be measured if those markets are distorted (price does not equal marginal cost). An empirical application from supply management in Canadian agriculture is provided. The results suggest that, if other markets are ignored, the social costs of supply restrictions may be overestimated by 50 percent. This is quite a large relative error indeed if one is interested in evaluating public policy from a social welfare standpoint. Copyright 1990 by Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:erevae:v:17:y:1990:i:1:p:57-67
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Christoph Weiss, Thomas Heckelei and Paolo Sckokai
More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and Christopher F. Baum ().