Economics at your fingertips  

The Political Economy of Commodity and Public Good Policies in European Agriculture: Implications for Policy Reform

Gordon Rausser and Harry de Gorter ()

European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1991, vol. 18, issue 3-4, 485-504

Abstract: Public policies are often classified as falling into two conceptually distinct categories: productive policies which are designed to provide public goods (PERTs) and predatory policies which are primarily intended to affect redistribution (PESTs). Governments engage in both types of policies simultaneously when there exists interactions between the consequences of the two types of policies. They must be chosen jointly. Failure to recognize the interactions between the effects of the two policies and failure to recognize the consequent jointness in the policy selection process can lead to misinterpretation of the effectiveness of each policy. Within this context, we explore the interrelatedness of public good policies and redistributive policies in European agriculture. We discuss the implications for reform of both types of policies. Copyright 1991 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Christoph Weiss, Thomas Heckelei and Paolo Sckokai

More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

Page updated 2020-06-15
Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:18:y:1991:i:3-4:p:485-504