 Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the ECDavid Abler () and James Shortle European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1992, vol. 19, issue 2, 197-217 Abstract: This paper analyzes restrictions on agricultural chemicals in the United States and the EC under various farm commodity policy scenarios using a partial equilibrium simulation model. The model has three regions (United States, EC, rest of the world) and four commodities (wheat, maize, coarse grains, soybeans). Medium- and long-run impacts are derived. Given existing farm programs, U.S. landowners gain from chemical restrictions while EC landowners generally lose. Given bilateral elimination of farm programs, both U.S. and EC landowners gain from chemical restrictions. Bilateral farm program elimination without chemical restrictions induces a shift in chemical usage from the EC to the United States. Copyright 1992 by Oxford University Press. Date: 1992 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:erevae:v:19:y:1992:i:2:p:197-217 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Timothy Richards, Salvatore Di Falco, Céline Nauges and Vincenzina Caputo More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.