Implementation of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and Developments for the Next Round of Negotiations
Tim Josling and
Stefan Tangermann
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1999, vol. 26, issue 3, 371-88
Abstract:
The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture has fundamentally changed the rules for international agricultural trade, and established quantitative constraints for agricultural policies of all WTO members. Although countries have tried to escape the new disciplines here and there, overall there has been substantial compliance, and implementation of the Agreement has proceeded smoothly. The next round of WTO negotiations on agriculture, to be launched in 1999, will have to clarify and strengthen some of the rules agreed during the Uruguay Round, but should mainly be devoted to negotiating further significant reductions. In addition, other issues that have emerged as contentious in the area of agricultural trade, and that will affect the next Round, will be discussed. Copyright 1999 by Oxford University Press.
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:erevae:v:26:y:1999:i:3:p:371-88
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Timothy Richards, Salvatore Di Falco, Céline Nauges and Vincenzina Caputo
More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().