Production standards, competition and vertical relationship
Jianyu Yu () and
Zohra Mechemache
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2016, vol. 43, issue 1, 79-111
Abstract:
This article investigates the collective choice of production standards by farmer and processor groups within a vertical food supply chain, taking into account their competition behaviours. We develop a general model to analyse the strategic motive of using standards to limit supply and shift rents between farmers and processors in the vertical chain. We find that a stringent standard can raise farmers' profit, but at the expense of processors. This is the case when the standard affects more variable costs than fixed cost of production, when the demand for the final product is inelastic, and when processors have a high degree of oligopoly power.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbv004 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Production standards, competition and vertical relationship (2013)
Working Paper: Production Standards, Competition and Vertical Relationship (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:erevae:v:43:y:2016:i:1:p:79-111.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Timothy Richards, Salvatore Di Falco, Céline Nauges and Vincenzina Caputo
More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().