Alternative approaches to risk in aggregative programming: An evaluation
John A. Wicks
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1978, vol. 5, issue 2, 159-173
Abstract:
The choice of an appropriate technique for incorporating risk into aggregative programming models currently appears to be based largely on ad hoc criteria. In this paper an attempt is made to examine some of the conceptual issues which are typically ignored. Within the framework developed, the sector of APMAA which models the South Western Slopes of New South Wales is used to examine the differences in predicted results which arise as a consequence of these alternative treatments of risk. Results are obtained for sixteen formulations of risk based on the focus-loss, mean-variance or flexibility constraint approaches. These are compared with actual changes for one-year and four-year adjustment periods using the correctness of direction of change and Theil's inequality coefficient (U) as criteria.
Date: 1978
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/5.2.159 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:erevae:v:5:y:1978:i:2:p:159-173.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
European Review of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Timothy Richards, Salvatore Di Falco, Céline Nauges and Vincenzina Caputo
More articles in European Review of Agricultural Economics from Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().