EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Gender of Study Partners and Research Participants Associated With Differences in Study Partner Ratings of Cognition and Activity Level

Shana D Stites, Anna Gurian, Cameron Coykendall, Emily A Largent, Kristin Harkins, Jason Karlawish and Norma Coe

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2023, vol. 78, issue 8, 1318-1329

Abstract: ObjectivesStudies of Alzheimer’s disease typically include “study partners” (SPs) who report on participants’ cognition and function. Prior studies show SP reports differ depending on the relationship between the SP and participant, that is, spouse or adult child. Adult children SPs are typically female. Could differing reports be due to gender? Knowing this may help explain variability in measurement.MethodsThe Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study enrolled a subset of participants from the Health and Retirement Study. Each participant had an SP. Bivariate and multivariable regression models compared 718 SP–participant dyads.ResultsIn analyses of 4 groups defined by SP and participant gender, dyads composed of 2 women were less likely to identify as White (75.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.4–80.5) than dyads composed of 2 men (93.3%, 95% CI, 81.2–97.8). In analyses adjusted for the severity of cognitive and functional impairment, women SPs rated women participants as more active than they rated men, mean 2.15 (95% CI, 2.07–2.22) versus mean 2.30 (95% CI, 2.24–2.37), respectively, on a 4-point scale. Similarly, men SPs rated women participants as more active than they rated men, mean 2.1 (95% CI, 2.0–2.2) and mean 2.4 (95% CI, 2.3–2.5), respectively. In an analysis of cognitively unimpaired participants, women SPs rated participants’ memory worse than men SPs did (p

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Alzheimer’s prevention; Gendered dyads; Study partners (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad026 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1318-1329.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1318-1329.