EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effects of Cognitive Inhibition Preceding Voluntary Step Responses to Visual Stimuli in Young and Older Adults

Eunyoung Kwag, Dominic Bachmann, Kyungwan Kim, Igor Komnik, Wiebren Zijlstra and Vanessa Taler

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2024, vol. 79, issue 4, 853787-388

Abstract: ObjectivesAge-related changes in executive functions, especially inhibitory control, correlate to decreased balance control and increased fall risk. However, only a few studies focused on the performance of tasks integrating balance and inhibitory control. This study aims to determine the effects of cognitive inhibition preceding the initiation of voluntary steps in young and older adults.MethodsPerformance of 3 stepping tasks (a Simon, Flanker, and a combined Simon–Flanker task [SFT]) were analyzed in 23 young adults and 43 older adults. Each task included congruent and incongruent trials in different step directions. Analyses focused on temporal aspects of step responses as identified by changes in Center of Pressure (CoP) and foot position. A 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate “inhibition,” “age,” and “task” effects.ResultsWith large effect sizes, “inhibition” as well as “age” resulted in longer durations of an initial preparatory phase as well as the step response phase. The SFT showed the largest “task” effects. Duration of CoP movement had the largest impact on total step execution in older adults. A significant interaction effect of “age*inhibition” was found on the duration of CoP movement, but not on CoP onset.DiscussionOverall, our results demonstrate that cognitive inhibition has more impact in older adults, the longer duration of CoP movements in older adults may reflect an ineffective step preparation. Our examination of the duration of subsequent phases which comprise perceptual processing and conflict resolution, response initiation, and step execution sheds light on how cognitive inhibition affects voluntary stepping behavior in young and older adults.

Keywords: Balance; Cognitive demand; Fall risks; Inhibitory control; Motor control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae006 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:4:p:853787-388.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:4:p:853787-388.