Daily Rumination Among Older Men and Women: The Role of Perceived Family and Nonfamily Social Partner Life Stress

Kira S Birditt, Nicky J Newton, Angela Turkelson, Courtney A Polenick, Zexi Zhou, Karen L Fingerman and Derek M Isaacowitz

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2024, vol. 79, issue 5, 283-300

Abstract: ObjectivesWomen tend to ruminate more than men, and are generally more hypervigilant to the emotions of others in order to maintain positive social ties. Thus, compared to men, women may ruminate more when their social partners have greater life stresses. However, the literature on stressful events typically focuses on individuals’ experiences and perceptions of stressors experienced by specific social ties such as spousal partners and adult children. The purpose of this study was to examine links between perceptions of a broad array of family and nonfamily social partner stresses and daily rumination among older men and women.MethodsAdults aged 65 and older (N = 293, 55% women) completed baseline assessments of family and nonfamily life stressors and 5–6 consecutive nightly assessments regarding rumination, interpersonal tensions, worries, and support provision.ResultsMultilevel structural equation models revealed that perceptions of greater family and nonfamily life stressors were associated with greater rumination. The links between family stress and rumination varied by gender: family stress was related to greater rumination among women and not men. Moreover, among women, family and nonfamily stress–rumination links were accounted for by greater daily worries about others, and among men, the nonfamily stress–rumination link was due to greater interpersonal tensions as well as daily worries.DiscussionThese findings may be due in part to gender role socialization and women’s greater kin-keeping and investment in family ties.

Keywords: Gender; Interpersonal relationships; Well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae027 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:5:p:283-300.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().