The advantages of seeing the silver lining: how valuing emotions moderates the link between ambivalent ties and daily health

Colette J Brown, Karen S Rook, Susan T Charles and Karen L Fingerman

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2025, vol. 80, issue 9, gbaf124.

Abstract: ObjectivesRelationships that elicit both positive and negative emotions, known as ambivalent ties, are often linked to adverse health outcomes in later life. Their negative health impacts, however, may depend on how older adults appraise different emotional experiences (e.g., viewing relationship “ups and downs” as useful or meaningful). This study examined whether bivalent affect valuation (BAV; the extent to which people appraise both positive and negative emotions as valuable) moderates the link between ambivalent ties and health-related limitations in daily activities.MethodsCommunity-dwelling older adults (N = 250, older adults aged 65–89years) completed an in-person interview assessing their social ties and sociodemographic factors, followed by a self-administered questionnaire assessing their valuation of positive and negative emotions, and 5–6 days of momentary assessments examining their social encounters (every 3 h) and health-related limitations each day (at bedtime).ResultsOverall, greater exposure to ambivalent ties was associated with more health-related limitations across all days in the study period. Among older adults with greater BAV, however, greater exposure to ambivalent ties on a given day was associated with fewer health-related limitations that day compared to days with less exposure to ambivalent ties. Sensitivity analyses revealed that this effect was likely due to valuing negative affect, specifically.DiscussionThese findings highlight the importance of considering how older adults’ valuation of their emotions, particularly their negative emotions, might influence the health-related toll of ambivalent ties.

Keywords: ambivalence; social relationships; affect valuation; functional limitations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf124 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:9:p:gbaf124.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().