Incongruent caregiver–care recipient reports by care task and relationship type

Janecca A Chin and I-Fen Lin

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2026, vol. 81, issue 1, gbaf222.

Abstract: ObjectivesResearch on unpaid caregiving often relies on reports from either caregivers (CG) or care recipients (CR), yet dyadic accounts of whether care was provided and received often diverge. This study examines the extent of care report agreement—defined as caregivers and care recipients giving consistent reports of whether help with a task was provided or not—across care tasks (mobility, self-care, household chores, shopping, transportation, banking, and medication tracking) and by relationship type (spousal, parent–child, other kin, and nonkin dyads).MethodsWe pooled data from the 2011, 2015, and 2017 rounds of the National Study of Caregiving linked with the corresponding rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Analyses included descriptive statistics on 4 patterns of dyadic reports (CG-no/CR-no, CG-yes/CR-yes, CG-no/CR-yes, and CG-yes/CR-no) by care task and multinomial logistic regression models assessing variations in report congruence by relationship type.ResultsAgreement was highest for banking tasks and lowest for mobility help. In cases of disagreement, caregivers more often reported providing help than care recipients reported receiving it. Spousal dyads showed the highest agreement across most tasks, whereas parent–child, other kin, and nonkin dyads exhibited broadly comparable levels of agreement.DiscussionFinding underscores the importance of considering the quality and context of care reports. Amidst an increasingly complex and diverse care landscape, recognizing patterns of care reporting by task and relationship type is critical for improving survey design, advancing caregiving research, and informing policies to better support unpaid caregivers.

Keywords: Caregiving; Dyad; Kin; Nonkin; Reporting agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf222 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:1:p:gbaf222.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().