Experience and convergence: curiosities and speculation

Anne S. Miner, Pamela R. Haunschild and Andreas Schwab

Industrial and Corporate Change, 2003, vol. 12, issue 4, 789-813

Abstract: Many theoretical frameworks assume that increasing organizational experience will produce convergence in problems, outcomes and activities. In this paper, we present three curiosities from field research in which increasing experience apparently generated more, not less, variability. We suggest that under plausible and even mundane conditions, experience can systematically generate variability. We describe three specific situations: (i) the interaction of experience with higher level rules; (ii) experience in novelty-rewarding or top-score-only competitive systems; and (iii) experience involving repeated vicarious learning. We explore processes that may generate variability in these contexts, and factors that may shape whether experience will generate convergence or variability over time. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:12:y:2003:i:4:p:789-813

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry

More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().