EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: an introduction

Giovanni Dosi (), Franco Malerba (), Giovanni Ramello () and Francesco Silva

Industrial and Corporate Change, 2006, vol. 15, issue 6, 891-901

Abstract: This introduction sets in context the works that follow, which are meant to take stock of the theoretical advances and also historical changes since the seminal Arrow (1962) and Nelson (1959). First, we summarize some of the original Arrow--Nelson insights. Second, we map the subsequent developments shorthanded as the "Stanford-Yale-Sussex synthesis." A particularly controversial issue concerns the relationships between notional opportunities of innovation, private appropriability of return from innovating, and realized rates of innovation: hence, third, we briefly offer a framework for its discussion, in general and with reference to the private appropriation of scientific knowledge. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (15) Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:891-901

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by David Teece, Glenn R. Carroll, Nick Von Tunzelmann, Giovanni Dosi and Franco Malerba

More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2017-11-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:891-901