Technology complexity and target selection: the case of US hospital mergers
Núria Mas and
Giovanni Valentini
Industrial and Corporate Change, 2015, vol. 24, issue 2, 511-537
Abstract:
This article examines the role of technology in the selection of targets in a merger. Held technology should have a notable impact, especially in contexts in which specific know-how resides with experts as well as within organizational routines that are difficult to reproduce. By acquiring a target, firms obtain novel technologies, along with the knowledge and capabilities necessary to implement them. Such acquisitions become more relevant as the complexity of the technologies increases. With a focus on the US hospital market—in which technology is a relevant factor and complexity has been growing—the hypotheses tests use data from 222 mergers and acquisitions that took place between 1985 and 2000. The results confirm that technology is a fundamental driver of the US hospital consolidation process: hospitals prefer targets that hold a different set of technologies from their own, especially when those technologies are complex and involve some know-how that is difficult to replicate.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtu017 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:24:y:2015:i:2:p:511-537.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry
More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().